Stinger Crash!

Kinja'd!!! "Steve in Manhattan" (blogenfreude01)
01/02/2018 at 23:32 • Filed to: Australia

Kinja'd!!!3 Kinja'd!!! 12

Love this guy - sure it’s an Aussie ratings system, but that might be better than U.S. ...


DISCUSSION (12)


Kinja'd!!! Spanfeller is a twat > Steve in Manhattan
01/02/2018 at 23:59

Kinja'd!!!0

I think its perfectly all right that cars are receiving a better rating for crash prevention systems, but we need to remember that in the end all that tech can only prevent the crash, not handle it.


Kinja'd!!! Urambo Tauro > Steve in Manhattan
01/03/2018 at 00:02

Kinja'd!!!1

Ah, this guy. Yeah, I just discovered him a few months ago. I find him kind of grating (WWAAAAAAYY??), but he’s well-researched and can smell BS a mile away. I get a lot out of his videos.


Kinja'd!!! Steve in Manhattan > Spanfeller is a twat
01/03/2018 at 00:08

Kinja'd!!!0

Those are variables that, I imagine, are difficult to distill into one crash rating. If I’m a better driver than average without crash prevention, do I do better than another drive with the aides in place? It’s all variables.


Kinja'd!!! Spanfeller is a twat > Steve in Manhattan
01/03/2018 at 00:11

Kinja'd!!!1

I think that a car should receive three ratings

Crash avoidance

Crash response

Average safety

Lets say that the Stinger has a five star response but a 0 star avoidance, then it gets 2.5 (which rounds up to 3)

But if the stinger has a three star response but a 5 star avoidance, then the average should top where the response ends, thus it would be a three star car.


Kinja'd!!! DC3 LS, will be perpetually replacing cars until the end of time > Steve in Manhattan
01/03/2018 at 00:57

Kinja'd!!!1

Why are anarcho-capitalists so concerned about the Stinger’s safety ratings?


Kinja'd!!! Steve in Manhattan > Urambo Tauro
01/03/2018 at 01:14

Kinja'd!!!1

Annoying is my middle name ... so I love the bastard.


Kinja'd!!! Steve in Manhattan > DC3 LS, will be perpetually replacing cars until the end of time
01/03/2018 at 01:15

Kinja'd!!!0

Provides them with a good living?


Kinja'd!!! My bird IS the word > Steve in Manhattan
01/03/2018 at 11:52

Kinja'd!!!0

So what you are saying is that crash safety is becoming worthless as unnecessary computer nannies drop you two whole stars instead of just one.


Kinja'd!!! Steve in Manhattan > My bird IS the word
01/03/2018 at 18:38

Kinja'd!!!0

Perhaps the rating themselves are less useful, but I don’t know enough about this to do anything other than speculate. But I think Cadogan’s a good expert.


Kinja'd!!! My bird IS the word > Steve in Manhattan
01/04/2018 at 13:18

Kinja'd!!!0

yea, less useful is a much more accurate term.


Kinja'd!!! Steve in Manhattan > My bird IS the word
01/04/2018 at 17:05

Kinja'd!!!0

The other thing is, there are only so many ways they can crash a car. If you get t-boned or have an offset crash like in the tests, it should perform as advertised. On the other hand, a different sort of crash could turn out better, or perhaps much worse. Some days I’m glad I live in the city.


Kinja'd!!! My bird IS the word > Steve in Manhattan
01/05/2018 at 12:40

Kinja'd!!!0

I don’t know. “crash avoidance” seems like it should be a completely separate test.